The analysis of Pushkin's village summarizes the most important thing. "Village" (Pushkin): analysis of the poem (detailed)
When interpreting the "Village", they turn first of all to the political idea contained in it. The anti-serfdom orientation of the poem serves as a convincing example of the undoubted love of freedom of the young Pushkin. However, focusing on a political idea, they often pass by the indisputable fact that it is subordinated to Pushkin's broad thoughts about his vocation, about poetic service, about the influence of life on art and art on life.
The central image in the poem is the image of a poet reflecting on his fate and his talent. But the poet is not fenced off from life's anxieties and worries. He responds to them and at the same time experiences them directly. And he decisively connects his poetic fate with the share of the people, with the quests of the progressive people of his time. Without in any way rejecting the anti-serfdom orientation of the Village, one cannot fail to see that the perception of the poem only as a political declaration narrows its meaning.
Writing history
The Village was written by Pushkin in July 1819. At that time Pushkin was young. He recently graduated from the Lyceum and settled in St. Petersburg. Among his friends and acquaintances are poets and freedom-lovers, dissatisfied with the autocracy and serfdom. They yearn for change and want to bring the desired hour of freedom closer. Communication with them infects Pushkin. In 1818-1819, the poet wrote the satirical "Tales" ("Hurray! Jumps to Russia ..."), "To Chaadaev", the epigrams "To Sturdzu" ("Serf of the crowned soldier" and "Around Sturdza I go ..."), he is credited with epigrams "Two Alexandram Pavlovichs" and "On Arakcheeva". The famous "Village" is also included in the circle of these freedom-loving poems.
The lyrical image of the village
The title of the poem, like its first lines, sets up an idyllic mood. In European poetry, the village was usually idealized, depicted as a blossoming paradise, a haven of inspiration, creativity, friendship, love, an island of independence. This tradition dates back to hoary antiquity. In the era of antiquity, a bucolic, or pastoral (both words mean "shepherd"), lyrics arose. It glorified the beauty of nature, the delights of a peaceful rural life, happy solitude away from the vain, full of selfish temptations of urban civilization. On this basis, the genre of idyll developed - a poetic or prose work in which writers admired the serene village life and the good manners of its inhabitants. Idylls were popular among Russian poets as well. Idyllic motives often penetrated elegies and messages. In the literature of the new era, the blissful idea of the village, as if not knowing social and other conflicts, poverty, slavery, has already been shaken. Radishchev dealt a decisive blow to him with his "Journey from St. Petersburg to Moscow". The noble intelligentsia had already dimly begun to understand that the captivity of the cities was connected with the serfdom of the villages, that the spiritual slavery of the nobles was not aloof from the servitude of the peasants, because the class that oppressed another class was itself not free. And yet, the idyllic perception of the village was persistent: in contrast to the city, it seemed like a corner of freedom, spiritual purity, and poetic dreams.
The village attracts Pushkin. He understands the high feelings of the poets, who breathe and live more freely in rural solitude. A conventional image of an idyllic lyricist appears in the poem, and this image is close and dear to Pushkin. Here for the first time, perhaps, the lyrical motive of the unity of labor and inspiration sounds as a guarantee of a full-fledged creative life, to which he aspires and the light of which will illuminate his entire poetic destiny in the future. From the time of the Village, this union will be equated by Pushkin with the concept of happiness. There, in a secluded corner, he would subsequently tear in vain from Petersburg, from the court, from the evil court rabble pursuing him, in order to freely surrender to labor and inspiration.
The theme of a voluntary escape from the stuffy light (“I exchanged a vicious courtyard with a circus, Luxurious feasts, fun, delusions ...”) in the “Village” is weighty and significant. No wonder Pushkin repeats twice, like a spell: "I am yours ..." Pictures of nature, contemplated by the poet, it would seem, reinforce the serene mood.
The rural view, pleasing to the eye, promises a fruitful future and disposes of lofty reflections. However, the idyll does not become the goal of Pushkin's image: nature, rural silence, "contentment", "work" and "free idleness" encourage the poet to search for the meaning of life, instill in him sublime experiences.
The young idyllic acquires the features of a poet-philosopher and directly addresses the great figures of mankind, whose "creative thoughts" he especially sensitively hears "in the majestic solitude":
Oracles of the ages, I ask you here!
This is how the two central stanzas are born, in which Pushkin trustingly reveals his intimate ideal of a true poet. He feels himself not as a hermit in the wilderness, cowardly fleeing from the troubles of life, but as an artist-thinker who assimilates the diverse impressions of reality and the progressive ideas of the century. He is acutely experiencing the need to touch the fullness of being, which gives food to work and inspiration, inseparable for him from the knowledge and proclamation of truth.
Analysis of the poem "Village"
The idyllic depiction of village life does not become the poetic subject of The Village and even its first two stanzas. From the theme of rural loneliness and rupture with urban civilization sprouts new topic- creative work, high inspiration that fills rural leisure:
He drives laziness to sleep gloomy,
To labor gives rise to a heat in me,
Th your creative thoughts
The depths of the soul ripen!
Two stanzas placed in the center (“I am here, freed from vain shackles ...” and “Oracles of the ages, I ask you here!”) Form the ideological focus of the poem and express Pushkin's true dreams. He does not at all want to remain an idyllic poet, a singer of rural solitude. He is worried about public sentiments and is not attracted by the vain search for fame and not only by admiring the beautiful nature, but by the search for truth and the meaning of life. The development of the lyrical theme, given at the beginning of the poem, is accomplished, as it were, through its assimilation and expansion, and partly by negation. From the narrow, narrow framework of bucolic lyrics, Pushkin breaks out into the wide expanse of philosophical and civic lyrics. Accordingly, the conventional image of the poet also changes - the elegiac gives way to an active philosopher and citizen, how Pushkin sees a real creator and how he thinks of himself.
However, the poet's dream is clouded by the spectacle of slavery, and his peace of mind- "the necessary", as he will say later, "the condition of the beautiful" - has been destroyed. The beginning of the last stanza:
But a terrible thought here darkens the soul ...
opposed to the two central stanzas. "A terrible thought" fetters the free flight of imagination and creative inspiration. The course of Pushkin's thought is obvious: the reason for the collapse of lofty hopes lies in circumstances beyond the poet's control. There is no room for free creativity where freedom is outraged, where "ignorance is a fatal shame" reigns. Philosophical and civil theme of Pushkin's poem "Village" develops into a political topic. Idyllic and philosophical motives coalesce with civic preaching. While people are suffering, the poet's heart cannot be calm, for his soul is wounded by a gross contempt for the "law." As a citizen and humanist, a “friend of humanity,” Pushkin is seized with anger and pain at the sight of slavery. Pictures of ignorance and violence give rise to formidable invectives in the last stanza. The idyllic mood was gone.
The expression "friend of humanity" may have contained an allusion to the proud nickname of Marat - "friend of the people", but, most likely, it contains a more general humanistic meaning.
There is no idyll in life, and therefore should not exist in art. Sharp contradictions in life are not conducive to lofty philosophical dreams of the enduring values of being. It would seem that the terrible modernity, having rejected the poet's calmness, the ability to feel the fullness of being and cooled the creative heat, awakened in his sensitive soul "floridness ... gift". After all, Pushkin is indignant, denounces, loud, oratorical intonations are heard in his speech. But why, then, in the words "Oh, if my voice could disturb the hearts!" there is a clear regret that his poems are unable to excite people? Why does he now call his poetic "fervor" "barren" and bitterly asks:
That barren heat burns in my chest,
And a formidable gift was not given to me as a lot of ornateness?
The lines given return memory to all previous text. Let us remember that the village solitude was conducive to reflections, that here the poet learned to “find bliss in the truth” and the “heat” of inspired labor was born in him and “creative thoughts” were already ripening. But the spectacle of slavery extinguished the fire of thought, and it did not give tangible results, became "sterile." In the last stanza, Pushkin not only denounces the "wild nobility" - he is bitter for the vain, futile efforts of the burning poetic labor. Pictures of arbitrariness violated peace of mind poet, harmony between inspiration and work. And at the same time, Pushkin cannot but respond to the suffering of people and is even ready to devote himself to the struggle against despotism, just to destroy it. However, in Pushkin lives an acute awareness of the originality of his inherent poetic talent, and his inherent idea of poetry, and the understanding that art, revealing life's contradictions and facilitating their understanding, still does not cancel and does not resolve them.
Satirical indignation and civic preaching, according to the poet, is not the only task of creativity. In addition, Pushkin does not feel himself an exclusively civic tendentious poet and does not confine his lyrics to civic themes and motives or pastoral chants. Poetry in Pushkin's presentation is broader, fuller, richer than mere contemplative enjoyment of rural views or purely civil denunciations. Several years will pass, and Pushkin will say about Ryleev's antithesis “I am not a poet, but a citizen”: “… If someone writes poetry, then first of all he must be a poet; if you just want to become a citizen, then write in prose. " At the same time, he will strongly object to the exclusion from poetry and satire, and jokes, and funny, and touching, and dreamy. Poetic creativity is equally subject to severe civic consciousness, and blissful pacification, and the eagle's flight of thought, and the immediate sensual charm of being. He has access to odic solemnity, and melancholic pensiveness, and idyllic naivety, and elegiac complaint, and bitter mockery, and a mischievous smile.
This all-encompassing view of poetry, the ground of which is reality, and the goal is the truth of life, is already taking shape in early works, and The Village is undoubted evidence of this. That is why Pushkin understands the roads and peaceful songs of rural silence, and passionate civil speech. The image of the poet, drawn to his winged imagination, is multifaceted. Pushkin does not give particular preference to either the voice of the idyllic poet, or the voice of the accusatory poet. His ideal is a poet-philosopher, a poet-humanist. BV Tomashevsky in his excellent book "Pushkin" wrote about the "Village": "It is significant that the combination of these words (" work and inspiration ") appears in a poem dedicated to a political theme." However, in this case, it would be more accurate to say otherwise: it is significant that the political theme is organically woven into a poem dedicated to creative self-determination. In The Village, she appears as part of a poetic reflection on her own vocation, on an exceptional thirst for creativity, on an ineradicable impulse to truth. Pushkin is waiting for permission social contradictions not from poetry. He hopes for the restoration of the "law" "from above":
I’ll see, oh friends! not oppressed people
And slavery, fallen by the mania of the king ...
He believes that if the social conflict is eliminated, then the prosperity of the fatherland will come, the mental wounds inflicted on his offended sense of humanity will be healed, and the broad prospects of creativity will expand. And we must appreciate this maximalist and holy civic obsession of Pushkin with a high measure. Unlike the ideas of Ryleev and other Decembrist poets, Pushkin's poetic ideal does not consist in the removal of certain, primarily intimate motives from the lyrics. Pushkin addresses a broad and free reflection of reality, not constrained by any previously imposed restrictions that exclude certain motives and genres from the sphere of poetry. Pushkin's lyrics reject neither elegiac nor civic sentiments.
Defending the poet's right to a variety of life impressions, Pushkin is not inclined either to a one-sided preference for only elegiac or only tendentious rhetorical lyrics, or to their humiliation or prohibition. That is why the image of the poet, created by Pushkin in the two middle stanzas of The Village, is not identical to either the idyllic poet or the citizen poet, although he has many similarities with them. The idyllic poet and the citizen poet are inalienable facets of the humanist poet, philosopher poet, “friend of humanity”.
Inherent in the poem "Village" striving for completeness and for the truth of reflection of life predetermined Pushkin's "universal responsiveness" and the universal humanistic pathos of his work, which cannot be reduced to any strictly outlined doctrine, social or philosophical teaching. The personality and poetry of Pushkin from his early years are imbued with a life-loving and wise humanism that has grown on real, earthly soil.
The poem "Village" was written by A.S. Pushkin in 1819 on the estate of his father and belongs to the Petersburg period of creativity.
"The Village" is a socio-political monologue and touches upon the problems of the present and future of Russia, which are deeply troubling for the author. Being by his convictions a supporter of the constitutional monarchy, Pushkin denounces the dominant in the country serfdom, believes that the deliverance of the peasants from the heavy burden must occur "from above", "by the tsar's mania."
An interesting feature of the poem is the use of genre mixing by the author. Composition, vocabulary, visual means create a gradually increasing emotional uplift.
The first part of the work is filled with the poet's contemplative and elegiac reflections on the Russian village, the compositional core here is the lyrical landscape of Mikhailovsky, similar to the pictures of nature from the poem "I Visited Again".
The sentimental countryside landscape with its "light streams", "azure plains" of lakes and "wet shores" creates a sense of calm and serenity. The boundlessness and spaciousness of the horizon is like a natural symbol of the poet's liberation from the "vain shackles", the acquisition of the desired peace "in the bosom of happiness and oblivion" and the opportunity to indulge in spiritual searches.
Unlike the first part of the poem, the genre of which is closest to the sentimental pastoral, the second part most of all resembles a political pamphlet, that is, a work of an accusatory nature.
Poetic beauty native nature do not hide from gaze lyric hero other pictures of the Russian village:
"Ignorance is a murderous shame", squalid "huts", "courtyard crowds of tortured slaves."
without feeling, without law
Appropriated itself with a violent vine
And labor, and property, and the time of the farmer.
The poet is determined to turn the gaze of those in power to what a difficult and humiliated existence "lean slavery" drags out, dreams of seeing "an un oppressed people", with all his heart regrets the inadequacy of his call.
Therefore, the poem "Village" ends not at all with a statement, but with an insistent question:
I will see, oh, friends, the people are not oppressed
And Slavery, fallen by the mania of the king,
And over the fatherland of the enlightened Freedom
Will the beautiful Dawn finally rise?
This ending is not accidental. Pushkin waits for an answer, but does not find it.
Thus, the contrasting opposition of the beauty of nature and real life supported by the genre contrast of the poem - an idyll and a pamphlet.
The poet uses the means of poetic expressiveness, thanks to which the effect conceived by the poet is achieved.
Antonymic images and oppositions play a huge role:
"Wild nobility" - "Skinny slavery",
"Free idleness" - "painful yarom",
"Creative thoughts" - "a terrible thought",
"Everywhere there are traces of contentment and labor" - "everywhere Ignorance is a murderous Shame",
"I am here, freed from vain shackles ..." - "courtyards of a crowd of tortured slaves",
"The vicious courtyard of Circe" - "the peaceful noise of the oak groves".
Pushkin includes exclamations characteristic of the odic genre in the poem "Village":
"Oracles of centuries, here I ask you!", "Oh, if my voice could disturb the hearts!"
as well as rhetorical questions:
"Why is a barren heat burning in my chest?" not oppressed people? "
Incidentally, such appeals are also characteristic of the journalistic style of the pamphlet. The sound of solemnity gives the work a poetic dimension - six-foot iambic, the so-called Alexandrian verse, characteristic of the odic genre.
During Pushkin's lifetime, only the first part of the poem was printed. The second was distributed only in lists. The complete Village was published by Herzen abroad in 1856, and in Russia only in 1870.
The rustic atmosphere gave the soul of A.S. Pushkin pacification, at the same time the poet was oppressed by the lack of rights of the peasants. These mixed feelings are reflected in the poem, which will be discussed in the article. Pupils study it in the 9th grade. We invite you to familiarize yourself with brief analysis"Village" according to plan.
Brief analysis
History of creation- the poet began working on the poem in 1819 in Mikhailovsky, and completed it in St. Petersburg. The village was published only in 1826 under the name "Solitude".
Poem theme- the beauty of the countryside and the oppression of the people.
Composition- The analyzed work is a monologue of a lyrical hero, which is divided into two parts, contrasting in mood: an appeal to rural nature, a story about the lack of rights of peasants. The poem consists of five stanzas with different amounts lines.
genre- a message with elegy elements.
Poetic size- six-foot iambic, all types of rhyming are used in the work.
Metaphors – "Haven of peace, work and inspiration"(about the village), "The bosom of happiness and oblivion", "winged mills", "the lordship ... appropriated to itself with a violent vine and labor, and property, and the time of the farmer".
Epithets – "Luxurious feasts", "dark garden", "fragrant ricks", "azure plains", "striped fields", "stately seclusion", "insensible whim".
History of creation
V early XIX century in Russia, the peasant question was actively discussed. The authorities received information about the circumstances of the life of the common people, literature was replenished with works that reveal the problem of oppression of the peasants, and censorship increased supervision. In such conditions, in 1819, the poem "Village" appeared.
Alexander Sergeevich began working on the work in Mikhailovsky. Its original version fell into the hands of Alexander I. The emperor spoke positively about the poetry and even expressed gratitude to the young poet. But at this time Pushkin did not publish The Village. In 1825, after the Decembrist uprising, censorship control increased. The poem had to be revised to be published. The first part of the text, with corrections, was published in 1826 under the title "Solitude". Full text saw the world only in 1829. The name "Village" was used in later publications.
Topic
In the work, the author reveals two themes: the village atmosphere and the oppression of the peasants. Contrasting in mood, they complement each other, give expressiveness to each other. Both problems are conveyed through the prism of the lyrical hero's perception.
The first four stanzas of the poem are dedicated to the rural atmosphere. They depict beautiful landscapes, reflect the emotions of the lyrical "I". The hero turns to the "desert corner", enjoying its serenity. The man admits that for the sake of these sensations he left fun and feasts. Here he feels how thoughts themselves are born in his head.
Further, the lyrical hero recreates free landscapes. The peculiarity of pictures of nature is that with the help of them "love" for the village atmosphere is expressed. The landscape sketches are very colorful. They cover everything: meadows with ricks, streams, lakes, hills and fields. In the distance, the lyrical hero sees herds, huts and mills. The pictures of nature breathe calmness, at the same time they are dynamic. In the fourth stanza, the lyrical "I" tells that the bosom of nature is the best place for creativity.
After idyllic pictures, lines appear expressing the oppressed state of the lyric hero. The thing is that landscapes are just a beautiful shell, the wrong side of which is the unhappy life of peasants. The lordship made it possible to take everything from people: labor, time, property. Alexander Sergeevich openly says that all this was done illegally, by force. In the last lines, the lyrical hero expresses the fact that someday the people will free themselves.
Composition
According to the meaning, the poem is divided into two parts: an appeal of the lyric hero to the village, including landscape sketches and a story about the life of the people. The formal composition does not correspond to the semantic one. The poem consists of five quatrains, each of which continues the previous one.
genre
The genre of the work is a message with elegy elements. The author describes landscapes, intertwining them with meditations, at the same time, the lyrical hero turns to the village. In the last lines disappointment and sadness are clearly manifested. Poetic meter - six-foot iambic. A.S. Pushkin used all types of rhyme: cross ABAB, circular ABBA and parallel AABB.
Expression tools
In the work, the poet uses means of expression. With the help of them, he creates a panoramic picture of the village, conveys the emotions that overwhelm the lyrical hero.
The text often contains metaphors: “A haven of calmness, work and inspiration” (about the village), “the bosom of happiness and oblivion”, “winged mills”, “lordship ... appropriated to itself with a violent vine and labor, and property, and the time of the farmer”.
Landscapes and reflections are complemented epithets- "luxurious feasts", "dark garden", "fragrant ricks", "azure plains", "striped fields", "stately solitude", "insensitive whim", "tortured slaves".
Poem test
Analysis rating
Average rating: 4.4. Total ratings received: 97.
The poem "Village" was written by Pushkin in 1819, during the so-called "Petersburg" period of his work. For the poet, this was a time of active participation in the social and political life of the country, visiting the secret union of the Decembrists, friendship with Ryleev, Lunin, Chaadaev. The most important issues for Pushkin during this period were the social structure of Russia, the social and political lack of freedom of many people, the despotism of the autocratic-serf system of government ...
Thus, the poet devotes the poem "Village" to the problem of serfdom, which worried many thinking people of that time. The poem has a two-part composition: the first part (before the words "... but the thought is terrible ...") is an idyll, while the second is a political declaration, an appeal to the strong of the world this.
For a lyric hero, a village is, on the one hand, a “desert corner”, a kind of ideal world where silence and harmony reign. In this land, "a haven of peace, work and inspiration", the hero gains spiritual freedom, indulges in "creative thoughts." The images of this part of the poem: “a dark garden with its coolness and flowers”, “light streams”, “striped fields”, “scattered huts in the distance”, “winged mills” are undoubtedly romanticized, which creates an idyllic picture of peace and tranquility. But a completely different side of life in the village is revealed to us in the second part, where the poet mercilessly denounces the outrage social relations, the arbitrariness of the landowners and the disenfranchised position of the people. “Wild lordship” and “lean slavery”, the main images of this part, embody “murderous shame of ignorance”, all the incorrectness and inhumanity of serfdom. The lyrical hero, identified with the poet himself, who calls himself “a friend of humanity”, does not accept this injustice and lawlessness, wants to “disturb the hearts ...” of people, exposing the atrocities of the landowners and the hopelessness of the life of the peasants, dreams of seeing “the people are not oppressed” and “the fatherland of the freedom of the enlightened ”. But the world surrounding the hero, full of cruelty and violence, a world where some "a burdensome yoke to the grave entice", while others, "not seeing tears, not listening to the groan", "appropriated for themselves labor, property, and the time of the farmer", looks especially ugly against the background of beautiful, harmonious nature, the kingdom of "happiness and oblivion." Thus, a contrast is created between the two parts of the poem, which makes it possible to reveal with particular force the idea of inferiority, the impossibility of the existence of serfdom.
The poet also uses a lot of pictorial and expressive means of the language. In the first part, they create a romantic and peaceful atmosphere: “the stream of my days is pouring”, “winged mills”, “azure plains of lakes”, “peaceful noise of oak groves”, “silence of fields”. And in the second part, the poet uses the pictorial means to expose with the greatest vividness the ugliness of the social system: “... with a violent vine”, “alien plow”, “tortured slaves”, “inexorable owner”. In addition, the last seven lines of the poem are filled with rhetorical questions and exclamations, for they have the character of an appeal to others, express the lyrical hero's indignation and his unwillingness to put up with the unjust structure of society.
The size of the poem is six-foot iambic. Rhyme - both masculine and feminine, both cross and ring:
Greetings, deserted corner (female),
Shelter of tranquility, work and inspiration (male),
Where my days are pouring an invisible stream (f.)
In the bosom of happiness and oblivion (m.)
(cross rhyme a-b-a-b).
I am yours - I love this dark garden
With its coolness and colors,
This meadow, laden with fragrant ricks,
Where bright streams in the bushes rustle
(ring rhyme a-b-b-a).
The devoted love of Alexander Sergeevich Pushkin to his homeland is reflected in many lyric works... The poet spent a long time in Mikhailovskoye, which is associated with joy, longing, and long exile from the capital. Here, in July 1819, he wrote the ode "Village". Dedicated to the problems of serfdom, it tells about hard peasant labor and the luxurious life of the rich. Analyzing the poem, one can note the statements of the great poet about the despotic autocracy, inhuman serfdom ("... here the lordship is wild"). The theme of the poem bears the influence of the views of the Decembrists, friendly conversations with Chaadaev, communication with Ryleev. The poet is worried about the social structure of Russia.
The creation of the work is associated with important milestone in the life of a poet. This period of Pushkin's creativity is called Petersburg. The poet is actively involved in public life, meets with members of closed societies. Thinking about the problems of serfdom. The poet sees that most of the people in his environment still have no desire to notice in what poverty the peasants live. The landowners use the labor of serfs, considering it fair. Pushkin talks about those poor people who do not know the feeling of freedom and justice. The poet managed to come to the Mikhailovskoye estate for a short time. Country life attracts him. Pushkin likes rural loneliness, he is more free to breathe and live. It was on the estate that the poet wrote the famous "Village" elegy.
The theme and idea of Pushkin's poem "Village" from a simple landscape develop into a political theme. The work is dedicated to the topic of serfdom, which was relevant at that time. The poet shows his destructiveness, cruelty and injustice in relation to common people... The poem has two important themes. In the first, the author confesses his love for his native land, and the second sounds like a political declaration that darkens the soul and tunes in to a philosophical mood. Describing village life, the tranquil beauty of nature, the author speaks of inspiration, literary creativity and spiritual purification. The second part is sharply opposed to everything that the poet spoke about at the beginning. There are statements against the autocracy, its despotism, cruelty ("a terrible thought here darkens the soul"). The work is complex in composition. The poetic meter is six-foot iambic, rhyming in different ways. Ring and cross rhyme is present.
The genre of the poem is unusual. In the ode "Village" the poet combined political satire with the genre of elegy. In the first part, quiet pictures are created, around the "wilderness of solitude", "desert corner", etc. This rural landscape is conducive to poetry. Here is a haven of tranquility and harmony. Moments of inspiration come. The "shelter of tranquility", of sensitive beautiful nature is very poetic. Suddenly, the work changes in tone and content. The poet who has moved to the village cannot find peace, he notices poverty and troubles all around, and calls them "lean slavery" as their cause. Through opposition, thoughts are born about a bright dawn, which should rise over the expanses of the fatherland. Young poet calls on the king to abolish slavery and hand over freedom and enlightenment to the people. The author reflects on the injustice that reigns around, dreams of the time when it disappears. But will Pushkin himself see this? Can the people become free? Speaking with the people who are oppressed, the poet wants his voice to “be able to disturb the hearts”. Having achieved this, the author will be able to make the world better and more just with verse lines. But this is unreal. The last lines say that the poet hopes for the august person who will put an end to human suffering.
