UFO and antigravity. The principle of operation of the UFO engine
31.07.11 Vasily Petrovich Mikhailyuk, a physicist-ufologist who finally comprehended the principle of operation of the UFO engine. His invention is patented in Ukraine as a Magnetic Transport Machine (Patent B64G1\00, 9\00. No. 60455 and F 04С5\00 No. 54238). Now he lives in the village of Pribrezhnoye, Saki region of Crimea.
Aircraft instruments can themselves turn on and off from the influence of the Earth's magnetic pole. And if a flying saucer is not far away, which also has non-uniform poles from different sides, and the plane hits the same pole with it, then the plane will sharply throw or simply drop.
And UFOs, it seems to me, refuel with the energy of lightning discharges. And if both are in the same thunderclouds, then all the relays will fail, and the plane is doomed. Because with a very powerful influence of the magnetic force lines of the "saucer" the pilot will not be able to do anything.
Especially if the plane flies not from the side, but from above or below. And there was a lot of controversy about the death of Gagarin. If I could present my works somewhere... But I need support, people who would realize and see the truth in them.
I posted my patents on the Internet so that they can be used and adopted. Not so long ago I received a call from Yegorov, who ran with Medvedev for the presidency of Russia. He became interested in my materials.
When I talk to a person and he is talking nonsense, I understand that this is not so. Everyone has his own big earthly road and small corridors... A scientist cannot be normal, he will inevitably "shift" on his science. Yes, sometimes it jumps...
White trail to real eternity
How did your invention start?
On July 11, 1968, at night I was returning from a youth "party". There was steppe on one side of the road, private buildings on the other. About three hundred meters before the house, something suddenly stopped me. Looking around, I saw: an increasing bright white light was silently moving in my direction. Having flown at an altitude of about 80-100 meters at a speed of 60-80 km / h, he disappeared behind the steppe horizon.
I was even more struck by the fact that behind that “light” a bright plume with a diameter of about three meters stretched for 4-5 kilometers. At the same time, he did not illuminate anything around. Soon he began to disappear with a crash, turning into a mass of separate white lumps.
Subsequently, trying to understand what I saw, I re-read mountains of literature, but nothing could explain such a phenomenon.
About eight years later, two permanent magnets fell into my hands. While manipulating them, I unexpectedly realized their direct involvement in a long-standing phenomenon.
Thus began my design of non-traditional power plants, completely new types of transport, including aerospace.
You have probably tested your theory on specific models...
Certainly. The first successful "modernization" was a piston engine, the energy in which was laid for at least 5-6 years of continuous operation.
And what did he look like?
Two heads of the block from permanent magnets, between them the magnetic piston.
The homogeneous poles repel each other, and the piston is at the epicenter of strong pressure. Interrupting it with screen plates, we forced the piston to make reciprocating movements.
In a modified rotary engine, we used the action of centrifugal forces thanks to the rubber-like material from which the base of the stators and rotor was made. The design feature is that the magnetic rotor is not attached, but constantly hangs on the magnetic pads of the yellow-shaped stators. When working, an induction field arises, which with force pushes the object away from itself; its opposite pole, inside, attracts with no less force. The weight of the machine becomes minimal due to the centrifugal forces of the rotating shaft.
On the same principle, I developed the high-precision combat system TOON-1 (special purpose transport facility), which can deliver a special cargo to anywhere in the world hundreds of times cheaper and faster. It can even be used to neutralize a dangerous unearthly body (for example, a meteorite). Not only physically, by explosion, but also by creating a powerful artificial magnetic field, thanks to which the body will go off its course and move away from the Earth without destruction.
To the mystery of the UFO movement
For me, however, the Magnetic Transport Machine (MTM) developed for the exploration of distant outer space is more important. Agree that the current bulky expensive devices that burn fuel and are completely dependent on the Earth's gravity are outdated long ago. During the flight, almost the entire structure is destroyed. For example, less than 1% of its total weight returned from an American spacecraft that launched from Earth to the Moon. My design, without a lot of energy, can take off into outer space at least ten times a day and return intact.
How was the development of the magnetic transport machine and its control system?
The spinning top-shaped magnetic machine I created is a super-powerful source of an inductive field. However, it was not possible to control it for many years - it does not receive a radio control signal, because it is surrounded by a strong inductive magnetic field. real case put everything in its place.
Somehow my wife and I drew attention to the "fantasy" story of our son Taras: he had just flown with some guys in brilliant suits on a round spaceship, where there were a lot of flashing lights and different buttons. Among them stood out two large red ones and two white ones. He was allowed to use one of the whites. I pressed it with difficulty - and the ship flew in ...
This seemingly childish fantasy gave me the idea that the machine should be divided into two independent parts, and Both halves will be turned on and off with red and white buttons. After such an innovation, the machine began to create a magnetic field around itself in a controlled manner and, therefore, to make reciprocating movements between the poles. With love and pride, I named this design in honor of my wife by the name "Hope".
A stunning confirmation of the correctness of the idea was an article in the "Interesting newspaper" No. 8 for 2004 "Wunderkind alien origin". It was about an eight-year-old boy Boris, who visited a UFO, very similar to Nadezhda. There is no doubt that in the Galaxy we will certainly meet brothers in mind flying on such devices.
Humanity has been using the unique and cheap energy of a permanent magnet for a long time, but for some reason it is afraid to call this source a permanent energy accumulator.
household example. The price of magnetic and electric suction cups of furniture cabinets is about the same. But if the cost of the magnetic does not change over the years, then in the electric one in a year, taking into account the current consumed, it will double. In other words,
Permanent magnets give off during operation many times more than they contain.
What happens when permanent magnets are used? - When they are turned towards each other by large areas and uniform poles, the vectors of force lines are shielded to half, and the rest are deployed in opposition to each other, and there is a long-term one-sided pressure (movement) without interruption and "recharging".
The use of artificial magnets and their ability to create mechanical movement radically changes the world level of science, our whole life.
MTM "Nadezhda" is capable of making any human-controlled movements, completely replacing all our vehicles.
Technologically, the mass production of a magnetic transport vehicle is no more difficult than the manufacture of a small car, with the addition of a computer processor, the cost is 10-15 times lower ...
It's hard to imagine. Is it possible ... to feel ... with your own hands?
I suggest that those who wish to make the simplest prototype of MTM themselves. Place a permanent magnet on the water raft. Like a compass needle, it will lock in the direction of the poles of natural magnetism. Now cover one side of the magnet with an iron screen and the raft will float north or south. If you place the screen on the other end of the magnet, the raft will move in the opposite direction. This is the key to the mystery of the movement of unidentified flying objects!
When the flight accelerates due to interaction with natural magnetism, the machine leaves a white trail behind it ... So the secret of the night white plume of 1968, which I often observed in the night sky, was finally revealed to me.
Probably, moisture is frozen by cold energy converters.
The second modernization was a turbine, designed on the basis of a steam turbine, where the rotor is pushed by homogeneous, one-sidedly directed poles of permanent magnets. The application of this principle in an airliner would reduce its weight by 25 - 30, the engine - by 35 - 45%.
Then a rotary magnetic motor appeared, created on the basis of an ordinary three-phase electric motor. It can not only give energy to the output shaft, but also generate electric current thanks to the wire windings placed around, that is, in the induction field. Such a micropower plant can, for example, be placed in a lamp, refrigerator, TV or vacuum cleaner as an energy source for many years, until the magnetic field lines run out.
Running from the hot Luminary?
So, does mankind need to burn oil products if ultra-cheap energy converters have been invented?
If you apply them to the operation of an automobile engine, there will be enough energy for 60-70 thousand kilometers; airliners without landing and refueling can stay in the air for 5-6 years. Think about it: Ukraine, suffocating without oil and gas, can (and should!) Become a world exporter of ultra-cheap energy technologies!
In addition, I am sure that in the near future it is quite possible to stop the ecological catastrophe of our planet.
If people were able to fully apply the obvious influence of natural magnetism on terrestrial bodies, and the designers of steam engines created pressure on the piston or turbine walls by the lines of force of permanent magnets, there would be no need to extract coal, oil, gas, uranium, build power plants, including including nuclear, power lines with substations, iron and car roads...
Isn't it all too fantastic?!
- ... The burning of petroleum products has accelerated the already catastrophic process of warming on Earth. In the near future, our Sun will warm the Earth by another 5-10 degrees, after which vegetation will disappear from it, animals and people will die out.
- Why do you think so?
Because due to the increase in temperature, the Earth will lose its magnetism, following Mercury and Venus, it will leave its orbit and merge with the Sun in a spiral.
A sad prospect… Is there no salvation? As they say in fantasy novels, it's time to move
To another planet, with better living conditions?
Even if such a planet is found, it will take many centuries for the scientific and practical re-equipment of man, mass migration and improvement. To regulate the climate, you need to really understand the mystery of the Earth's orbit and its rotation around its axis.
Let me give you a simple example: a tourist lit a fire. At first I felt warm and cozy. But the fire got too hot. What to do?
So for humanity to survive, it is necessary to move the planet away from the Sun to a safe distance. And learn to take it away from collisions with other cosmic bodies.
Is that possible?
Yes. It is no secret that all bodies on Earth are surrounded by a magnetic field and are under the influence of natural magnetism. This means that it is possible to regulate the climate by temporarily shielding the Earth's magnetic poles with sections of iron plates. If necessary, they take a horizontal position. By partially closing such "blinds" at both poles, humanity will weaken the influence of the vortex magnetism of the cosmos on the magnetism of the planet, and the Earth will "move away" from the Sun, creating a new, distant orbit for itself.
But it's terribly expensive! And due to what will such "blinds" operate?
The source of energy is super-cheap heavy-duty generators of yule-shaped machines. Developments to improve the climate should be started today, before the intensive melting of glaciers begins.
To control the movement of the Earth will require the intellectual efforts of all scientists and politicians of the planet, a great economic and industrial potential. But there is simply no other way for humanity to survive.
In flight - Baba Yaga
I would like to understand why, say, when landing, passenger and military aircraft, even those piloted by experienced pilots, often find themselves very far from the runway. Usually the cause is sought in the "human factor". The same problems exist in astronautics, maritime transport.
- Let me give you a practical example. Let's throw two balls - a regular one and one pasted over with flat plates of permanent magnets. The second will fall much later. The difference in direction, distance, speed, trajectory is also inevitable.
According to Galileo, when a body falls, it moves under the influence of gravity and air resistance ... - One could agree with the great scientist if the force of natural magnetism did not exist around the Earth. Outside, the plates have one magnetic pole, inside - the opposite. Hence the global difference between ordinary bodies and the same aircraft, around which a uniform magnetic field is concentrated.
In many fairy tales it is said about the magic carpet that without any engine it flies through the air...
Obviously, already in antiquity it was known that bodies surrounded by a uniform magnetic field can move in a controlled manner, interacting with natural magnetism. I am also surprised by other "technical means" in fairy tales. For example, the flying stupa at Grandma Yagusi had a cylindrical shape, resembling a rotary magnetic machine with an artificial magnetic pole around it, with a "cargo" place in the middle.
I assume that a UFO in the form of a plate or a cylinder is a free technological "license". Earthlings observed UFOs even in the form of a pyramid, which is generally difficult to comprehend. I'll give my guess.
According to my calculations, the pyramid is an ultra-simple construction of four rigid generators capable of creating a magnetic field, which globally increases the reliability of the "cocked hat" and simplifies the control system to a minimum. The efficiency with this design is brought to 1.
What does science think about your ideas?
Generations of scientists only within the strict framework of physical laws moved along the path of scientific and technological progress. However, there were phenomena that went against the usual. Fearing ridicule and possible removal from their favorite work, few of them openly criticized the obvious shortcomings of the scientific world. Simple intellectuals, "Kulibins" from the people, knowing only the original foundations, thought unconventionally, which often led to amazing inventions and world discoveries. Although, alas, much more often they were cut down in the bud by the envy and megalomania of pundits. That is why official science, having exhausted its resources, has reached a dead end. For example, there is nothing new in the development of world aviation today. The laws of Earth's attraction and the laws of aerodynamics still dictate the shape of the apparatus, the power of the metal-intensive heat engine. For some reason, designers do not want to use the centrifugal forces of rotating parts to lighten the weight of the machine. But the disc-shaped shape of the airliner would reduce its total weight to zero.
The world's spacecraft are also doomed, because gravity does not allow them to break away from the Earth and go into weightlessness at minimal cost. Without the use of centrifugal forces, they will never take off into space by shuttle ten, fifteen times a day. And in open space devices need a constant supply of energy. Marking the spot of scientists and designers has led to the fact that there are no cheap, light, powerful, safe, universal and durable sources of energy in the world, including those for aerospace technology. The dependence on the gravity of the Earth has not been eliminated either.
But it's so simple.
On the Earth and the Moon, there is a different magnetic field in strength and shape, as well as a different flow of moving magnetism, dictated by the speed of rotation around the axis. Accordingly, the attraction of bodies to their surface is also different. By artificially surrounding the earthly body with the force of lunar magnetism and giving it "zero" revolutions, we will bring its weight up to the lunar one.
Our planet holds and "pulls" the disproportionately magnetized Moon behind it precisely due to its own natural magnetism. In perigee and apogee, the Moon clearly shows the presence of magnetism poles on the Earth. Which, in turn, is strictly kept in its orbit due to cosmic vortex magnetism and the energy of the Sun. With a powerful thermal and magnetic flux, the Sun pushes the Earth away from itself, and one of the vortex flows of space, formed from a spiral Milky Way, from all sides presses it to the Sun through the natural magnetism of the Earth, forming a neutral earth orbit. Unlike the Moon, the Earth has magnetic poles proportional in strength, and therefore the vortex flow of space rolls the Earth in orbit during the year. In the same way, the unique rings around Saturn confirm the presence of the magnetic force boundaries of the Sun, Saturn and the vortex flow of space.
magnetized swallow
All this is not easy for non-specialists to understand ...
Here is a clear example of the influence of natural magnetism on the human body. In big sports, you can achieve the desired result not only by physical effort, but also with the help of ... magnetic doping placed in clothes. On the outside, one magnetic pole, inside - the opposite. My friends dubbed this phenomenon a tailwind "magnetic breeze". As a result, as we already know, a horizontally thrown ball with a uniform magnetic circle on the competition field will really play along with its team...
In nature, this fact is clearly visible during the seasonal migration of marine life and birds. I was always surprised by the "non-stop" flights of birds, say, from Europe to latin america. It is not difficult to assume that our "winged brothers" have long since learned to create a magnetic pole around themselves and with the help of magnetic flux Earth without stopping to overcome thousands of kilometers.
As early as the beginning of the 20th century, Academician G.S. Landsberg wrote: "It must be made clear that we are neglecting the deformations solid body or liquid". And this phenomenon just opens a new era of physical laws that allow unraveling the mystery of the design of UFOs.
Copyright: Leonid Terentiev, 2010
Publication Certificate No. 21006070681
The design and device of the flying
Cymbals (LT) - individual units
In the diagram of each device are viewed
identical units and assemblies:
1. Reactor
2. Energy storage
3. Mover
4. Blocks of LSS-protection
5. Power winding
6. Other components and assemblies
1. Reactor
The energy source of the alien aircraft, hereinafter referred to as LT, is a compact reactor based on the radioactive decay of element 115 and the release of antimatter. The reactor is a sphere with a diameter of 30 - 40 cm. As can be seen from the figure, the reactor consists of several shells surrounding the inner cavity. These shells most likely represent the reactor's cooling and protection system. The first (inner) shell may contain generators of a protective field, the purpose of which is to prevent decay products from reaching the chamber walls.
The second (middle) shell is a set of cavities through which the coolant circulates. The need for cooling is probably due to the fact that some of the decay products are a stream of photons passing through a field that traps other particles. Finally, the third shell is a durable reactor vessel. The dark-colored rods are emitters of neutrons necessary to support the decay reaction of element 115 and release antimatter.
2. Energy storage
After the decay of element 115, when it is irradiated with neutrons, a certain amount of antimatter is formed, which is transported through a channel-pipe to a special chamber, where annihilation occurs in a gaseous medium, and the released energy in the form of a stream of photons is absorbed by a "refractory crystal-energy collector", which, apparently, represents is a photo-thermoelectric converter with efficiency close to 100%. The terrestrial analogue of this device is an isotope generator.
3. Mover
This device is a source of LT movement. Based on the available data, it can be assumed that it is an amplifier + emitter of gravitational waves. According to an article by physicist B. Lazar, the source of weak gravity waves is the same element 115, and the rest of the equipment picks up and amplifies these waves, like earthly radios. Three radiators (under 1200 in the horizontal plane) are installed on the LT, operating independently of each other. It has to do with flight mode:
Movement near the surface of the planet - 1 emitter is on. Omicron mode.
Movement in the stratosphere - 2 emitters are included.
Exit and movement in space - 3 emitters are included. Delta mode.
It is not difficult to see that additional emitters are included in the work as the external gravitational field weakens (for example, the field of a massive cosmic body). The effect of the emitters is the "collapse" of the space near the LT. There is not enough data for a more accurate explanation of the principle of LT movement. The question remains unclear - how is the direction of movement realized? It can be assumed that the emitters rotate in their mounts (spherical chamber).
in the LT of this design, the emitters are implemented in one piece - rotary.
Probably, when the radiator is rotated, the LT is "pushed out" in the direction opposite to the rotation. The disadvantage of the emitter system is strong electromagnetic radiation (in the microwave range), which propagates down and away from the LT, affecting the environment. Its action can be judged by the following facts: stoppage of internal combustion engines (except for diesel engines), disruption of electrical appliances when passing near the LT, "burns" on trees and grass, and, worst of all, radiation burns that people get in the field radiation action. That. to ensure the normal functioning of the LT and the work of the crew, protection from electromagnetic radiation is necessary.
4. Blocks of LSS-protection
LSS - life support system.
LSS blocks form a ring consisting of parallelepipeds and located under the pilot cabin or under the living space of the LT. The task of LSS blocks is to protect the crew and some units of the LT from microwave radiation, as well as from accelerations during the evolution of the LT. According to a large number of observations, LTs are capable of gaining supersonic speed from the "hover" position in a very short period of time (on the order of several seconds), instantly stopping or making sharp turns (for example, at a right angle) at high speed. With such evolutions, gigantic accelerations arise, therefore, without protection from them, the crew and passengers of the LT will have to be "scraped off the walls" of the apparatus.
There is not enough data to explain the principle of operation and the design of LSS blocks.
5. Power winding
On one of the LT diagrams, the power winding is designated as "transmission and power winding of cable channels." It is difficult to say something definite about the purpose of this device. This can be a unit for flight control of the LT (flight direction, change in altitude, turn), a unit for creating a plasma shell around the LT, a unit for creating a protective field, or part of the reactor cooling system and various units of the LT. The design of the cables is not clear: power cables, wires, hollow tubes.
6. Other components and assemblies
These include: control panel, crew seats, vision screens, photon emitters, neutralizers in the caisson chamber, signal light, landing legs.
6.1. Remote Control
Control panel with complex indicators on liquid crystals. LT control is thought-sensor from a helmet and wearable sensors.
Now on 5th generation aircraft, the method of displaying information on built-in computer monitors, cathode-ray or liquid crystal, is widely used.
Giving commands from the pilot to the LT can be carried out by the method of directed thought. Already now this method is feasible: a technique has been developed in which a sensor is implanted into the human skull, equipped with a piece of brain tissue, a gold electrode and registering the electrical potentials of the brain. The data is processed by a computer that sends human commands to the actuators.
Feedback (from external sensors and from view screens to the pilot) can be carried out in 2 ways: either directly to the pilot's brain (i.e., he kind of becomes an apparatus himself and senses the surrounding space using external sensors installed on the LT body), or information about the state of the LT and the surrounding space is sent to the console screens, and visual information is sent to the overview screens.
6.2. Crew seats
Anti-g isomorphic seat for the pilot.
It is little clear what overloads can be in an LT protected from gravity surges. It is likely that the chair automatically changes height and adjusts to the shape of the creature in it.
6.3. Overview Screens
The screens are monitors (probably liquid-crystal) to which the image of the surrounding space is transmitted from external "cameras". As such, LT does not have windows.
6.4. Photonic Emitters
A belt of photon emitters around the body of the LT (auxiliary engines). I believe that emitters, depending on the mode of operation, can serve as additional engines (for example, to provide maneuvers) or as a combat system.
6.5. Neutralizers
Neutralizers are located in the caisson chamber (lock) and most likely serve to clean the air from harmful bacteria, etc., entering the caisson with the planet's atmosphere. This operation can be carried out either by radiation, harmless to aliens and deadly to bacteria and viruses, or by filling the caisson with a neutralizing gas.
6.6. signal fire
Flashing light and spotlight. The first serves as an identification light, the second - as a searchlight to illuminate the area.
6.7. Landing legs
Automatically adjustable landing support depending on the terrain. The support container is recessed into the housing. The scheme is tricycle, forming an equilateral triangle.
Accumulated information about UFOs
A comprehensive study of the properties of the "behavior" and size of UFOs, regardless of their shape, allows us to conditionally divide them into four main types.
First : Very small objects, which are balls or discs with a diameter of 20-100 cm, which fly at low altitudes, sometimes fly out of and return to larger objects. There is a well-known case that took place in October 1948 in the Fargo airbase area (North Dakota), when the pilot Gormon unsuccessfully pursued a round luminous object with a diameter of 30 cm, which very skillfully maneuvered, evading the chase, and sometimes he himself rapidly moved towards the plane, forcing Hormone to dodge the collision.
Second : Small UFOs that are egg-shaped and disc-shaped and 2-3 m in diameter. They usually fly at low altitude and most often land. Small UFOs have also been repeatedly seen separating from and returning to the main objects.
Third : The main UFOs, most often disks with a diameter of 9-40 m, the height of which in the central part is 1/5-1/10 of their diameter. The main UFOs make independent flights in any layers of the atmosphere and sometimes land. Smaller objects can be separated from them.
Fourth : Large UFOs, usually in the form of cigars or cylinders, 100-800 meters or more in length. They appear.mainly.in the upper atmosphere, do not perform complex maneuvers, and sometimes hover at high altitude. There were no cases of their landing on the ground, but it was repeatedly observed how small objects separated from them. There is an assumption that large UFOs can fly in space. There are also isolated cases of observation of giant disks with a diameter of 100-200 m.
Such an object was observed during a test flight of the French Concorde aircraft at an altitude of 17,000 m over the Republic of Chad during the period solar eclipse On June 30, 1973, the crew and a group of scientists on the plane filmed and took a series of color photographs of a luminous object in the shape of a mushroom cap, 200 m in diameter and 80 m high, which followed an intersecting course. At the same time, the contours of the object were fuzzy, since it was apparently surrounded by an ionized plasma cloud. On February 2, 1974, the film was shown on French television. The results of this study have not been published.
Common forms of UFOs have varieties. Thus, for example, disks with one or two convex sides, balls with or without rings encircling them, as well as oblate and prolate spheres were observed. Rectangular and triangular objects are much less common. According to the French group for the study of aerospace phenomena, approximately 80% of all observed UFOs were round in the shape of discs, balls or spheres, and only 20% were elongated in the shape of cigars or cylinders. UFOs in the form of discs, spheres and cigars have been observed in most countries on all continents.
Examples of rare UFO sightings are given below. So, for example, UFOs with rings surrounding them, similar to the planet Saturn, were recorded in 1954 over Essex County (England) and over the city of Cincinnati (Ohio), in 1955 in Venezuela and in 1976 - over the Canary Islands .
A parallelepiped-shaped UFO was observed in July 1977 in the Tatar Strait by members of the crew of the Nikolai Ostrovsky ship. This object flew for 30 minutes next to the ship at an altitude of 300-400 m, and then disappeared.
Triangular-shaped UFOs from the end of 1989 began to systematically appear over Belgium. According to the description of many eyewitnesses, their dimensions were approximately 30 by 40 m, and on their lower part there were three or four luminous circles. Objects moved completely silently, hovering and taking off at great speeds. On March 31, 1990, southeast of Brussels, three credible eyewitnesses observed how such a triangular object six times the size of the visible disk of the moon flew silently over their heads at an altitude of 300-400 m. Four luminous circles were clearly visible on the underside of the object.
On the same day, engineer Alferlan filmed such an object flying over Brussels for two minutes with a video camera. In front of Alferlan's eyes, the object made a turn and three luminous circles and a red light between them became visible on its lower part. On the top of the object, Alferlan noticed a luminous lattice dome. This video was shown on April 15, 1990 on central television.
Along with the main forms of UFOs, there are many more various varieties. In a table shown at a meeting of the US Congress Committee on Science and Astronautics in 1968, 52 UFOs of various shapes were depicted.
According to the international ufological organization "Contact international", the following forms of UFOs are observed:
1) round: disc-shaped (with and without domes); in the form of an inverted plate, bowl, saucer or rugby ball (with and without a dome); in the form of two plates folded together (with and without two bulges); hat-shaped (with and without domes); similar to a bell; in the form of a sphere or a ball (with and without a dome); similar to the planet Saturn; ovoid or pear-shaped; barrel-shaped; similar to an onion or top;
2) oblong: rocket-like (with and without stabilizers); torpedo-shaped; cigar-shaped (without domes, with one or two domes); cylindrical; rod-shaped; spindle-shaped;
3) pointed: pyramidal; in the form of a regular or truncated cone; funnel-like; swept; in the form of a flat triangle (with and without a dome); diamond-shaped;
4) rectangular: bar-like; in the form of a cube or parallelepiped; in the form of a flat square and rectangle;
5) unusual: mushroom-shaped, toroidal with a hole in the center, wheel-shaped (with and without spokes), cruciform, deltoid, in the shape of the letter V.
Generalized NIKAP data on UFO sightings of various shapes in the USA for 1942-1963. are shown in the following table:
object shape, (number of cases/percentage of total case)
1. Disc-shaped 149 / 26
2. Spheres, ovals, ellipses 173 / 30
3. Type of rockets or cigars 46 / 8
4. Triangular 11/2
5. Luminous dots 140 / 25
6. Others 33 / 6
7. Radar (non-visual) observations 19 / 3
Total : 571 / 100
Notes:
1. Objects classified by their nature as spheres, ovals, and ellipses in this list may actually be disks inclined at an angle to the horizon.
2. Luminous dots in this list include small brightly luminous objects, the shape of which could not be determined due to the large distance.
It should be borne in mind that in many cases the readings of observers may not reflect the true shape of objects, since a disk-shaped object may look like a ball from below, like an ellipse from below, and like a spindle or a mushroom cap from the side; an object shaped like a cigar or an elongated sphere may look like a ball from the front and back; a cylindrical object can look like a parallelepiped from below and from the side, and like a ball from the front and back. In turn, the object in the form of a box in front and behind can look like a cube.
The data on the linear dimensions of the UFO, reported by eyewitnesses, are in some cases very relative, since with visual observation it is possible to determine with sufficient accuracy only the angular dimensions of the object.
Linear dimensions can only be determined if the distance from the observer to the object is known. But determining the distance in itself presents great difficulties, because the human eye, due to stereoscopic vision, can correctly determine the distance only within the range of up to 100 m. Therefore, the linear dimensions of a UFO can only be determined very approximately.
In our country, UFOs with "portholes" were observed in 1976 in the village of Sosenki near Moscow, in 1981 near Michurinsk, in 1985 near Geok-Tepe in the Ashgabat region. On some UFOs, rods similar to antennas or periscopes were clearly visible.
In February 1963, in the state of Victoria (Australia), at a height of 300 m above a tree, a disk 8 m in diameter hung with a rod resembling an antenna.
In July 1978, members of the crew of the ship "Yargora", following the Mediterranean Sea, observed a spherical object flying over North Africa, in the lower part of which three structures similar to antennas were visible.
Cases have also been recorded when these rods moved or rotated. Below are two such examples. In August 1976, Muscovite A.M. Troitsky and six other witnesses saw a silvery metal object over the Pirogov reservoir, eight times the size of the lunar disk, moving slowly at a height of several tens of meters. Two rotating stripes were visible on its side surface. When the object was above the witnesses, a black hatch opened in its lower part, from which a thin cylinder protruded. The lower part of this cylinder began to describe circles, while the upper part remained attached to the object.
In July 1978, passengers of the Sevastopol-Leningrad train near Kharkov watched for several minutes how some kind of rod with three brightly luminous points moved out of the upper part of a motionlessly hanging elliptical UFO. This rod was deflected to the right three times and returned to its previous position. Then a rod with one luminous dot extended from the bottom of the UFO.
Inside the lower part of the UFO, there are sometimes three or four landing legs, which extend during landing and retract inward during takeoff. Here are three examples of such observations.
In November 1957, Senior Lieutenant N., returning from Stead Air Force Base (Las Vegas), saw four disk-shaped UFOs with a diameter of 15 m on the field, each of which stood on three landing legs. As they took off, those props retracted inward before his eyes.
In July 1970, a young Frenchman, Erien J., near the village of Jabrelle-le-Bord, clearly saw how four metal supports, ending in rectangles, gradually retracted into a round UFO with a diameter of six meters that had taken off.
In the USSR in June 1979 in the city of Zolochev, Kharkov region, the witness Starchenko observed how a UFO landed 50 meters from him in the form of an overturned saucer with a number of portholes and a dome. When the object descended to a height of 5-6 m, three landing legs about 1 m long telescopically extended from its bottom, ending in a kind of blades. After standing on the ground for about 20 minutes, the object took off, and it was clear how the supports were drawn into its body.
At night, UFOs usually glow, sometimes their color and glow intensity change with speed. When flying rapidly, they have a color similar to that arising in the process of arc welding; at slower - bluish color. When dropped or braked, they turn red or orange. But it happens that even objects hovering motionless glow with a bright light, although it is possible that it is not the objects themselves that glow, but the air around them under the influence of some kind of radiation emanating from these objects.
Sometimes some kind of lights are visible on UFOs: on objects of an elongated shape - on the bow and stern, and on the disks - on the periphery and on the bottom. There are also reports of rotating objects with red, white or green lights.
In October 1989, in Cheboksary, six UFOs in the form of two saucers folded together hovered over the territory of the Industrial Tractor Plant production association. Then a seventh object joined them. Each of them showed yellow, green and red lights. Objects rotated and moved up and down. Half an hour later, six objects soared up with great speed and disappeared, and one remained for a while. Sometimes such lights are lit and go out in a certain sequence.
In September 1965, two police officers in Exeter, New York, observed a UFO flying about 27 m in diameter, on which there were five red lights that came on and went out in the sequence: 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, 4th, 3rd, 2nd, 1st. The duration of each cycle was 2 seconds.
A similar incident occurred in July 1967 in Newton, New Hampshire, where two former radar operators observed through a telescope a luminous object with a series of lights flashing on and off in the same sequence as on the object in Exeter.
the most important characteristic feature UFOs are a manifestation of their unusual properties that are not found either in natural phenomena known to us, or in technical means created by man. Moreover, it seems that the individual properties of these objects clearly contradict the laws of physics known to us.
based on site materials: http://souz.co.il/
In addition to officially declassified documents, most of them continue to gather dust in top-secret government archives. Not all documents related to UFOs are subject to the Freedom of Information Act. There is a special exception in the Law for documents, the disclosure of which could cause harm national security, and American services actively use this clause on lawsuits with ufologists. This once again confirms the direct connection of UFOs with the policies of individual states and global politics. And the fact that people associate ufology with “little green men” and lunatic asylums is most likely also artificially created in order to divert people’s attention from a problem that is taken more than seriously by military and government officials, or rather, by those who are aware in this area.
Obviously, the documents that remain classified contain the most valuable information about UFOs and their inhabitants. One of the documents applying for this role is proposed in this article. The document was obtained by renowned American ufologist Leonard Stringfield from a source he never met. The intermediary who transmitted this document, whom Stringfield knows well, preferred anonymity for fear of government persecution. The document, dated July 16, 1947, is a preliminary report on the results of an inspection of a crashed "flying disk". The accompanying letter to the report was signed by the commander of the US Air Force in 1947, General Nathan Twining. Preliminary report on UFO incidents in 1947.
1. As stated in the Presidential Directive of July 9, 1947, a preliminary examination of the recovered "flying disk" and the wreckage of a possible second disk was carried out at Army Headquarters [Eighth Air Force Headquarters in Fort Worth, Texas. - approx. author]. The information for this report was provided by the staff technical staff of the 2nd technical department and the aviation laboratory of the 3rd technical department. Additional data provided by the scientific staff of the Laboratory jet propulsion and the Scientific Advisory Department of the Air Force, headed by Dr. Theodor von Karman. Further analysis was carried out by the Science and Development Division.
2. Regarding the object under study, there is a collective opinion that the aircraft, picked up by parts of the army and the air force, does not belong to American production for the following reasons: currently under any project. b. The absence of any external propulsion system, power plant, ventilation and exhaust ducts, as well as propellers or a jet engine confirms this opinion. c. German scientists from Fort Bliss and White -Sands Proving Grounds [US Army secret facilities. - approx. author] cannot identify secret German weapons in these objects. True, the possibility remains that such a device was developed by the Russians. The absence of any markings, identification numbers, or instructions in Cyrillic has raised serious doubts among most that these objects are Russian-made.
3. The study of the interior of the apparatus revealed the presence of a compartment similar to an atomic engine. At least that was the opinion Dr. Oppenheimer and dr background Pocket. There is a possibility that a part of the apparatus itself constitutes a propulsion system that assigns the function of a heat exchanger to the reactor and plays the role of an energy storage device. This process is not like the release of energy in our atomic bombs. The description of the power room is as follows:
1) A donut-shaped tube, approximately thirty-five feet, made of plastic-like material, surrounds the central core. The tube turned out to be filled with a purified substance, possibly heavy water. The massive rod at the center of the tube is immersed in a coil of copper-like material that runs through the body of the tube. This may be a reactor control mechanism or a storage battery. No moving parts were found in the studied areas.
2) Activation apparently acts as the primary energy for the reactor electrical potential, although, at present, this is only a guess. It only remains unknown how a heavy water reactor functions in such an environment. This turret is equipped with a number of devices with unusual characteristics unknown to any of our engineers. Inside the turret are four circular cavities covered with an unknown smooth material. These cavities are symmetrical to each other, but appear to be mobile. True, it is not known how. This movement is associated with a domed room above the power plant. It is believed that the main propulsion system is a bladeless turbine, similar to the current developments under the project "Magnat". Dr. August Steinhoff (head of research), Dr. Werner von Braun and Dr. Theodore von Karman put forward the following theory: flying through the atmosphere, the aircraft somehow absorbs hydrogen and, in the process of induction, generates an atomic fusion reaction. For the apparatus to move, the air around it must be ionized. Linked to the surrounding "air foil", the aircraft can presumably have an unlimited range and flight speed. This may explain the reported absence of any noise.
4. The living compartment is located at the top. It is round with a domed top. The absence of a canopy, observation windows, portholes or any other optical projections confirms the opinion that the device is controlled remotely.
1) Semicircular screen (possibly television).
2) The living quarters were sealed with a special hardening compound.
3) There are no traces of welding, riveting or soldering.
4) The components of the apparatus are of impeccable shape and quality In conclusion, it remains to be noted that in this document, of particular interest is a rather detailed description of the internal structure of the “flying saucer” and the principle of operation of the aircraft. If the document is genuine, then the information contained in it can be a significant contribution to ufology and to the formation of knowledge about the technical aspects of UFOs.
The material was prepared by ufologist Gennady Komov
According to another assumption, UFOs are a special form of life. It is clear that if unidentified flying objects represent an atmospheric paradox or creature, it is not necessary to talk about its structure from the standpoint of technical analysis. Only in the event that UFOs are products of the highest civilization, we can talk about its structure.
In March 1959, an unknown object was observed in Warsaw hovering over the Palace of Culture and Science.
The object looked like two spheres of different diameters connected by a cylinder. Later, he reincarnated into a disk and retired towards Mlocin, but soon returned back and assumed his former form.
Exists great amount hypotheses about the nature of Unidentified Flying Objects (UFOs). For example, it is alleged that outsiders mistake a form of ball lightning for a UFO. According to another assumption, UFOs are a special form of life. It is clear that if unidentified flying objects represent an atmospheric paradox or a living being, it is not necessary to talk about its structure from the standpoint of technical analysis. Only in the event that UFOs are products of the highest civilization, we can talk about its structure.
Appearance, size and shape
Unidentified flying objects, as before, remain "black boxes" for us. We can only guess how they are arranged and what purpose these or other elements of their design have. With all this, any conclusions can only be based on an analogy with the standards of terrestrial technology, since we have no other examples from the corresponding field before our eyes. It is clear that a similar approach is fraught with misinterpretation, but until such time as the invaders themselves want to tell us about the structure and principles of their own aircraft, we have no choice but to trust our emotional organs and our (limited) ideas about the laws of the development of science and technology.
Let's start, as expected, with the shape and size of the UFO. And the size and shape of flying saucers can be very different. With all this, in fact, "plates" do not occupy the most significant place in the rating of observations. According to French ufologists, 30% of all unidentified objects are spheroids, disks (that is, "plates") - 16%, cylinders - 14%, egg-shaped objects - 14%, various triangles, cubes, comets, dumbbells, crosses - 14%, point UFOs - 9%, dome-shaped - 3%. The size of objects with all this varies from a few cm to 10 km, in the main - from 2 to 70 meters (usually there are numbers 5 - 10 meters).
Russian ufologist German Kolchin divides UFOs in shape and size into four main groups.
1st group - very small objects, which are balls or disks with a diameter of 20 to 100 cm, which fly at low altitudes, from time to time fly out of larger objects and return to them.
There is a well-known case that took place in October 1948 near the Fargo airbase (North Dakota), when the pilot Gormon unsuccessfully pursued a round luminous object with a diameter of 30 cm, which very skillfully maneuvered, evading the chase, and from time to time he himself quickly moved to the plane , forcing Gormone to move away from the collision.
2nd group - small UFOs, having an egg-shaped and disc-shaped shape and a diameter of 2 to 3 meters. These usually fly at low altitude and in most cases make landings.
Small UFOs have also been seen more than once separating from the main objects and returning to them.
"3rd group - "main" UFOs
4th group - huge UFOs in the form of cigars or cylinders with a length of 100 to 800 or more meters. They arise mainly in the upper layers of the atmosphere, do not perform complex maneuvers, and from time to time hang at high altitude. No cases of their landing on the ground were recorded, but more than once it was observed how small objects and “main” UFOs separated from them. There is an assumption that huge UFOs can only fly in space. There are also isolated cases of observation of cyclopean disks with a diameter of 100 to 200 meters above the towns.
A similar object was observed over the Republic of Chad during a test flight of the French Concorde aircraft at an altitude of 17,000 meters during the solar eclipse of June 30, 1973. The crew and a team of scientists on the plane filmed and took a series of color photographs of a luminous mushroom-cap-shaped object 200 meters across and 80 meters high, which followed an intersecting course. With all this, the contours of the object were fuzzy, because it was apparently surrounded by a cloud of plasma.
Common forms of UFOs have their own varieties. So, for example, discs with one or two convex sides, balls with or without rings encircling them, and also oblate and elongated spheres were observed. Rectangular and triangular objects are even rarer.
A parallelepiped-shaped UFO was observed in July 1977 in the Mongolian Strait by members of the crew of the Nikolai Ostrovsky ship. This object flew for 30 minutes next to the ship at an altitude of 300 - 400 meters, and later disappeared.
Triangular UFOs from the end of 1989 began to systematically appear over Belgium. According to the description of many witnesses, their dimensions were approximately 30 by 40 meters, while three or four luminous circles were placed on their lower part. Objects moved quite silently, hovering and taking off at high speeds.
On March 31, 1990, southeast of Brussels, three witnesses watched as such a triangular object 6 times larger than the visible disk of the moon flew silently over their heads at an altitude of 300 - 400 meters. Four glowing circles were correctly visible on the underside of the object. On the same day, engineer Alferlan filmed such an object flying over Brussels for 2 minutes. In Alferlan's eyes, the object made a turn and three luminous circles and a reddish light between them became visible on its lower part. On the upper part of the object, Alferlan saw a luminous grid dome.
It should also be taken into account that in almost all cases, the testimony of observers may not reflect the real shape of the objects, because a disk-shaped object looks like a ball from below, like an ellipse from the bottom-side, and like a spindle or a mushroom cap from the side. An object that has the shape of a cigar or an elongated sphere can look like a ball in front and behind. A cylindrical object can look like a parallelepiped from below and from the side, and like a ball in front and behind. In turn, the object in the form of a parallelepiped in front and behind can look like a cube.
The data on the linear dimensions and dimensions of the UFO, reported by witnesses, in a number of possible cases are very relative, because with visual observation, only the angular dimensions of the object can be found with sufficient accuracy. Linear dimensions can only be determined in this case if the distance from the observer to the object is clear. But determining the distance is problematic in itself, since the human eye, due to stereoscopic vision, can correctly determine the distance only within the limits of up to 100 meters.
Usually UFOs look like iron bodies of silver-aluminum or light pearl color. From time to time they are wrapped in a cloud, as a result of which their contours seem to be blurred. The surface of the UFO is shiny, as if polished, and no seams or rivets are visible on it. The top side of an object is usually light, while the bottom side is black. Some UFOs have domes that are transparent from time to time.
In the center of objects, in a number of possible cases, one or two rows of rectangular "windows" or round "portholes" were visible. On some UFOs, rods were seen that looked like antennas or periscopes. So, in February 1963, in the state of Victoria (Australia), at a height of 300 meters above a tree, a disk 8 meters in diameter hung with a rod similar to an antenna. And in July 1978, crew members of the Yargora ship, sailing along the Mediterranean Sea, watched a spherical object flying over North Africa, in the lower part of which three structures similar to antennas were visible.
Cases were also recorded when these rods moved or rotated. In August 1976, Muscovite Troitsky and 6 other eyewitnesses saw a silvery iron object over the Pirogov reservoir, 8 times the size of the lunar disk, slowly moving at a height of several 10 meters. Two swirling stripes were visible on its side surface. When the object was above the eyewitnesses, a dark hatch opened in its lower part, from which a narrow cylinder protruded. The lower part of this cylinder began to draw circles, while the upper part remained attached to the object.
In July 1978, passengers of the Sevastopol - Leningrad train near Kharkov watched for several minutes how a certain rod with 3 brightly luminous "points" advanced from the upper part of a motionlessly hanging elliptical UFO. This rod was deviated three times to the right and returned to its initial position.
From time to time, three or four landing legs are placed inside the lower part of the UFO, which extend during landing and retract inward during takeoff.
At night, UFOs usually shine, from time to time their colors and intensity of the glow change with the speed configuration. When flying fast, they have a color similar to that arising in the process of arc welding, when more leisurely - a bluish color. When falling or braking, they get a reddish or orange color. But it happens that hovering motionless objects shine with bright light.
From time to time, some kind of (signal?) lights are visible on UFOs: on objects of an elongated shape - on the bow and stern, and on disks - on the periphery and on the bottom. There are also reports about the rotation of objects with reddish, snow-white or greenish lights. From time to time, such lights light up and fade in a certain sequence.
In September 1965, two police officers in Exeter, New York, watched a UFO flight about 27 meters across, on which there were 5 reddish lights that lit up and went out in the sequence: 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4 th, 5th, 4th, 3rd, 2nd, 1st. The duration of each cycle was 2 seconds.
A similar incident occurred in July 1967 in Newton, New Hampshire, where two former radar operators watched through a telescope a luminous object with a series of lights that flashed and went out in the same sequence as at the object in Exeter.
In this way, despite the abundance of shapes and sizes, UFOs remind us of aircraft - the absence of wings with all this suggests that UFOs were created based on the widest range of speeds, including those speeds at which any plumage only harms the flow around the object. Indeed, there are many examples that indicate that UFOs are able to fly in space and in the atmosphere at high speeds completely silently, without disturbing the environment, while more reliable data are recorded using radar.
In the archives of ufologists, one can find a case when, in December 1952, the airborne radars of the B-29 bomber, flying at an altitude of 6000 meters, recorded several unknown objects flying past the aircraft at a speed of about 8000 km / h. After that, the crew members themselves saw eight more cyclopean UFOs that crossed the course of the aircraft at a speed that was later estimated at 14,000 km / h, and disappeared into the stratosphere. These objects were fixed and ground-based radar.
UFO flights with high speeds were also recorded: in 1949 over the White Sands test site (New Mexico) - a speed of 40,000 km / h, in 1952 over Terre Hout Airport (Indiana) - a speed of 67,000 km / h (7) and in 1953 over South Africa - a speed of 160,000 km / h (!).
Any aerodynamicist will confirm: wings are not necessary at such speeds, a sphere or a disk ("plate") is a good form of the device. It remains, however, a mystery what kind of engine is needed to accelerate the aircraft to similar speeds. But even this mystery fades against the backdrop of the mind-blowing ability of UFOs to transform.
UFO Transformations
A number of cases are known when observers created a memory, as if a UFO in flight changed its shape more than once.
In March 1959, an unknown object was observed in Warsaw hovering over the Palace of Culture and Science. The object looked like two spheres of different diameters connected by a cylinder. Later, he reincarnated into a disk and retired towards Mlocin, but soon returned back and assumed his former form.
A rather strange incident occurred in December 1969 near the village of Lyzovo, Perm Region, where two luminous ellipses appeared above the edge of the forest near the drilling rig. Later, they increased in size and turned into one ball, on both sides of which two balls of the smallest sizes appeared. Soon a spark flashed in the middle ball, which turned into a disk, slightly smaller than the moon, but much brighter than it. Later, instead of 3 balls of the correct form, only one ball of a rather loose structure with a disk in the center became visible, and after a few seconds the disk disappeared, and the incomprehensible ball disappeared beyond the horizon.
A multiple change in shape was recorded in a UFO flying over Estonia in June 1975. Appearing over Tallinn, it first had the shape of a silvery triangle, but later turned into a ball and flew to the east. Over Kehroy, he already looked like triangular pyramid, and above Aigvidu it had a T-shape and seemed transparent. Flying over Rakvere, it had a cylindrical shape, and over Kohtla-Järve - the shape of a testicle in a vertical position. Then he flew to Narva and, with the advent of darkness, lit up brightly. The height of the UFO flight was about 18 km. The object was moving against or perpendicular to the direction of the wind.
It is clear that there are many cases when individual objects, in the eyes of witnesses, seemed to be divided into two or more parts, which later scattered in different directions.
In September 1980, 200 miles southwest of Gibraltar, members of the crew of the research vessel Viktor Bugaev watched a snow-white cigar-shaped object hovering over the stern of the vessel with a dark stripe, from the 1st end of which two yellowish beams emanated. In the eyes of witnesses, this object was divided into two parts, of which one flew to the northeast, and the other to the northwest. The entire observation lasted 4 minutes and was recorded in the logbook.
The newspaper "Izvestia" dated March 23, 1988 described how on March 18, 1988, the crew and passengers of a Chinese plane flying from Beijing to Urumqi were watching an unknown object, similar to a basketball, which first moved towards the plane. Before their eyes, this object changed the direction of the flight, and later split into two parts, which rapidly moved away.
At the same time, there are cases when two similar objects merged into one.
In February 1974, in Valeni Munte (Romania), 10 pupils of an orphanage watched as two luminous orange spheres slowly approached each other and merged into an ellipsoidal object with a diameter of about 7 meters, which increased speed and disappeared.
In February 1979, under the city of Gorkovaty, one could watch how two luminous objects, leaving silver trails behind them, merged into one, which began to move away.
It happened that such separations alternated with connections, while this happened with objects several times in order.
In August 1968, the crew and passengers of an aircraft flying from Adelaide to Perth (Australia) watched a large UFO approaching the aircraft, to the right and left of which there were three small objects. In the eyes of witnesses, a large object was divided into two parts, after which groups of small objects began to fly around each of these halves. And the two halves of a huge UFO connected a couple of times and shared again.
In July 1977, in Baku, astrologer Tikhonov saw through a telescope a yellow-green object moving at a high altitude, which was divided into two halves, which diverged in different directions. After a few seconds, one of these halves also split into two parts, with each division accompanied by an explosion. Soon one of the small units joined the whole half, and later withdrew to its former position. Then all three parts approached (without connecting), and after a while they parted again and disappeared from sight.
It is not possible to find any satisfactory explanation for such transformations of UFOs. Our own development of the creation of air carriers so far assumes only the possibility of separating and launching a lighter aircraft from a more languid one - with all this, the shape of the carrier remains constant. It is hard to say what role UFO metamorphoses play for their functioning. Maybe the answer to this question should be found inside the UFO. In general, we will talk about this next time ...
The material presented here sometimes contradicts itself. I deliberately do not remove these contradictions - let everyone try to find for himself what he likes and awakens technical thought.
In a nutshell, here is the real design of the flying saucer engine. Perhaps not quite Schauberger. It's interesting though, sometimes some ideas pop up. Different people, in different places, different times, and similar thoughts come. Either people are the same, or the laws of nature. Would you believe that I have never read or even heard of the works of Schauberger before (I mean his engine powered by the energy of the environment, and besides, it has levitating properties)? But when by chance (thanks to the Internet) I came across a description of his designs, I was simply amazed how much what I have been thinking about for a long time is similar to his ideas. Externally, the Schauberger engine looks like this:
Its internal structure is as follows (turned upside down in relation to the photographs):
So that you understand that I do not cling to someone else's glory, I will try to explain its device in the simplest language, because nowhere is it really described how it works, despite its seemingly rather extensive representation on the Internet. In some places, the opinion slips that this engine is generally a hoax and cannot work at all. But I think it's not. I'll try to explain. Undoubtedly, the main part of the engine is this strange at first glance wheel (in the figure above it is marked on the left with an incomprehensible inscription, obviously "turbine").
Despite the apparent complexity of the main part, it can be easily manufactured. A similarity scan of such a turbine is shown below and can presumably be cut out of a metal plate 250x500 mm 1-2 mm thick and bent accordingly. The alignment of the turbine will occur automatically during rotation (it is proposed to attach the turbine to the axis of the motor-generator using 3 radial springs at 120 degrees - the turbine will "self" find its center of rotation).
The turbine itself will look like a jester's crown. It is the "jester" and not the "king" - I apologize for such a non-normative term-comparison. But in my opinion, this is the most convenient way to explain that the turbine has helical blades, radially curved from the center to the periphery.
At first glance - some kind of devilry of 24 corkscrews rotating around the circumference for opening bottles. Why is this needed? Here I link to my own site for a chapter on the origin of tornadoes. Schauberger, in this design of his, created ideal conditions for the formation of a group of mini-tornadoes and the central tornado itself, which is driving force of this design. Air at the first stage with the help of such a wheel is twisted around the axis of the electric motor. But the same air, when thrown to the periphery due to centrifugal force, passes through the corkscrews of the wheel and receives rotation along the axis of each of the 24 corkscrews. Air swirls around 2 axes of rotation at the same time. A rotation simultaneously around 2 axes this is such an amazing thing! Try to pick up a high-speed electric motor with a handwheel on the axis and rotate it around the axis of your own hand. Very interesting sensations. When turning the motor, forces are felt that act in completely different directions than you expect.
So this wheel forms 24 mini-tornadoes, which, bending around the inner surface of the upper part of the engine (looks like a copper basin in the photo below), along a very interesting trajectory (still turn the motor!) Break out onto the inner cone of the engine and move further to the outlet.
It is better to observe the process further in transverse section to understand what a tornado looks like when viewed from above. The first cut just below the "copper basin" is this cross section of a tornado. The other 2 are closer to the outlet. It was inconvenient to draw 24 balls, so I leave only 9, the principle is still the same. Moreover, this drawing somehow strangely echoes the drawing on wheat fields in England. Further, everywhere to the place and out of place, I will try to draw these wild analogies. Moreover, I saw photographs of the drawings in the margins much later than I completed all of the above. Isn't it strange: this cartoon below and the drawing on the wheat field were created absolutely independently of each other? However, even the number of minivortices coincided. 
So 24(9) balls, twisted from small whirlwinds, roll inside along the wall of the circle. The walls of each ball in relation to the neighbors rotate in opposite directions. I will consider these balls as a dual medium: it seems to be a ball, since it rolls like a part of a ball bearing and the laws of mechanics apply to it, but at the same time it is air, which is subject to the laws of hydrodynamics. These balls, in any collision of a neighbor with a neighbor, have the intention to "run into" each other and thus move to the center of the structure, all at the same time (try to see this in the cartoon on the left), and at the same time, the opposite movement of the walls of the neighboring balls is according to Bernoulli's law is a rarefied medium, it turns out the balls are "attracted" to each other. As a result, all this mass of rotating air is drawn to the center, accelerates significantly (because the diameter of the structure decreases), moves lower and finally flies out through the nozzle from the bottom of the structure. The wheel with corkscrews, as it rotates, constantly feeds these mini-vortex-bearings and draws in air from outside. Schauberger claims that this process becomes self-sustaining. Indeed, a natural tornado can exist for a long time and its very existence is obviously supported only by the presence of a pressure difference between the external environment and the inner cone of the tornado. And inside the engine, just in the center, a vacuum zone is formed. This means that the surrounding air should strive there, falling on the turbine blades with "corkscrews" and being involved in a complex rotation trajectory, which could be called a "self-turning donut". That's how it seems to me the basic principles of this engine. In my opinion, such a process can really be called some kind of opposite to a conventional explosion ( explosion), since the substance does not scatter to the sides, but vice versa strive to converge to one point(to the base of the vortex). Schauberger called this process implosion.
I drew these 3 frames with spinning balls-rollers and again a strange thought came to mind. On television again there was a story about the next appearance of unusual circles in the wheat fields of England (and not only there). But if I didn’t have an animator to illustrate my ideas, I would try to describe the contraction of the vortex to a point in the first graphics editor I came across with something like this drawing. In my opinion, this drawing on a wheat field is an unambiguous illustration of the processes taking place in a tornado and calls for the following main conclusion: the rotating minivortexes that make up a tornado are attracted to each other and tend to the main center of rotation. And here minivortices are drawn. Pay attention - next to each main circle, several additional circles are carefully drawn, directly indicating that several mini-processes are depicted here, moving in a spiral towards the center. More precisely, there are 6 of them and they work exactly as shown in my cartoon a little higher. It is absolutely certain that a volumetric process is drawn here on a plane (a whirlwind - a tornado - a tornado). Who drew it and why is a separate big question. Even during the day, create several such geometrically accurate circles - a big problem. And draw about 400 at night? It is unlikely that just a crazy person could do this. Maybe this can be understood as a kind of drawing-hint?
Let's go back to Schauberger. Witnesses to the operation of the Schauberger engine claimed that only air and water served as fuel. Maybe they were a little wrong. Most likely it was air and obviously alcohol (by the way, it looks like water). The engine in the process of operation should literally devour the surrounding air and then it's time to put fuel on it and set it on fire, further contributing to the process of vortex formation. At in large numbers The oxygen flame of alcohol is almost invisible. So the result was a "flameless and smokeless engine" as described in some publications.
Approximately the same type of construction I came to in my conclusions and propose something remotely reminiscent of Schauberger's "windmill", the work is generally based on the same principles. I was inspired by the funnel of water pouring out of the bathroom and what happens inside the structures below follows the same laws.
The difference from the Schauberger mechanism is the absence of an external cone, along which the vortex is pulled to the center and ejected through the nozzle, as well as a simpler design of the wheel for forming a vortex (in fact, this is a conventional centrifugal pump). My simplification of Schauberger's design (the cartoon on the left) is due to the simple idea that a natural tornado does not need all such tricks (although the "corkscrew" wheel that he invented causes nothing but admiration - it spins the air flow along 2 perpendicular axes of rotation in the simplest and most effective way !). My task is to spin the flow into a small tornado as simply as possible and preferably with the complete absence of mechanical parts. This can be achieved by using not a centrifugal pump impeller for spinning, but by using something similar to the MHD engine described on the Electric motor page. The design is completely devoid of moving parts (with the exception of the vortex itself). It turned out something like the one shown on the right cartoon. Yellow color - an attempt to depict burning fuel (possibly kerosene?). Moreover, for an MHD engine, there must be conductive kerosene (perhaps salted?). Then they suggested to me that there should be a sodium additive. Roughly speaking, this is an attempt to reproduce the formidable natural phenomenon in a can. And even more precisely the process, the essence of which is clear from the bottom cartoon.
"Tornado in a glass" "Just a tornado"
For the first time, Einstein saw the left drawing in an ordinary glass with tea and floating tea leaves (let's call it Einstein's glass). Take a closer look: the central ascending part is the "tornado's trunk" (only in the left figure it raises tea leaves, and on the right there are houses and cars). It is strange that Einstein himself did not draw such conclusions. And Schauberger seems to have done it. Almost all the designs that are offered on this site are based on the process that takes place in this glass.
So to speak - some points for the main engine of a flying saucer. True, only for the atmosphere. And the questions of horizontal flight have not yet been considered. Can you imagine how useful a device with such an engine would be for, say, the Ministry of Emergency Situations? Remember the fire at the Ostankino television tower and the complete helplessness of a helicopter flying around? And by the way, photographs of some UFOs, even by their very appearance, make one think that they have a central engine operating on the principles of the tin can described above, and such a machine would be much more useful than an ordinary helicopter. Simply irreplaceable. Torque is compensated by the presence of several engines on the same platform. Like in the bottom photo. In my opinion, there are 3 inverted Schauberger engines (such as Repulsine B) working for one central nozzle. And it’s probably more correct to place Repulsin like this:
In the photo UFO Adamsky relies on 3 (or 4?) engines similar to Repulsine B. These engines are attached to the bottom of the "hat" and generate 3 or 4 tornadoes on which the whole structure "dangles". One large and three smaller.
Let us return again to the Schauberger engine as an energy generator. The processes occurring in the Einstein glass are undoubtedly the basis of the engine. Let's try to achieve a stable passage of the process. To do this, spin the water in the tank using a disk on the axis of the electric motor motor. Water after spinning will move along a complex trajectory. 
(fluid movement is described on the site www.evert.de, a computer drawing from this site is given). Very interesting conclusions can be drawn from this figure. The linear speed of water movement along this ornate path is constant and is determined by the linear speed movement of the edges of the disc. The liquid dispersed by the disk spirals down and is further pushed towards the center. At this moment there is an increase in the angular velocity of water rotation. (A vivid analogue of such an increase in the speed of rotation is the rotation of a thread with a load when winding this thread around a finger). The fluid rises with an increased angular velocity and rests against the central part of the disk. Here is the most interesting. The speed of rotation of water in the central region is higher than the speed of rotation of the disc! The water "pushes" the disk in the direction of rotation. The rotating stream supports itself! Almost like a perpetual motion machine. But as always, friction forces interfere. And the process is quite stable and low-damping. By the way, a little distracted: if you spin water in an ordinary bucket, even without the help of a disk, the water will still rotate according to the same laws and the water will rotate for quite a long time, because here there is self-support of water rotation - just no one ever pays attention to it (it is enough to tightly close the lid of the bucket filled exactly to the brim - the rotation will stop pretty quickly). What do I want to say? Only one thing - a vortex is very easy to obtain when spinning a liquid or gas under unequal conditions of rotation from above and below, and this is an almost ready-made self-supporting system. You need quite a bit of energy and the process will be undamped. Moreover: the vortex absorbs energy in the form of heat from the environment! Now I will try to explain. Consider a simplified diagram of the Schauberger engine. If we ignore everything secondary, then the design fits into the following simple scheme, which in fact is nothing more than a continuation of the idea glass Einstein a. 
Inside at the top - a rotating disk (red). Below is a small vertically standing plate. This achieves uneven conditions during rotation for the lower and upper layers water (air?). On the left is a heat exchanger (it will be discussed later). Above - a motor-generator, at first it works as a process starter, after entering the tornado mode - to extract energy. The valve on the heat exchanger is a process switch. The arrow on the left is the working body of the device heated by the environment.
What happens during the operation of this device? Everything is simple. Centrifugal forces create increased pressure at the walls of the vessel. And a vacuum in the central part. Due to the higher angular velocity of rotation of the upper layers of water (air) in comparison with the lower ones, a meridional flow is created, descending along the walls of the vessel. And rising in the central part (in nature, this is nothing more than a "tornado trunk"). Liquid (gas), moving along its sophisticated trajectory, then gets into the area of compression, then into the area of rarefaction. Let's remember the simplest law of physics - the Boyle-Mariotte law. If we take a certain mass of gas, then with forced compression, the gas heats up. And when rarefied, it cools. It is in the central part of the device that the water-air mixture enters the region of forced rarefaction by centrifugal forces. In this case, for a finite mass of gas, decrease in temperature and increase in volume. This increase in volume gives an increase in the kinetic movement of the flow from bottom to top along the central axis of the device. This recharged jet with new energy enters the turbine disk, causing it to spin faster and produce an even more intense whirlwind. which creates an even higher vacuum, and so on and so forth. The cooled moist air is expelled by centrifugal force into the heat exchanger tube. Ideally, the temperature of the heat exchanger is near absolute zero. The environment surrounding the heat exchanger, which is normal from our point of view, is an "environment with excess energy". The heat exchanger is heated by it and the thermal energy enters the inside of the device, eventually converting into the rotation of a "self-turning donut" from moist air inside the device.
I want to make a small note about the Ranque effect (temperature separation of a gas jet in the so-called "Ranque tubes"). No one really explains this effect. And in my opinion, everything is simple. There is the Boyle-Mariotte law (the product of pressure and volume at a constant temperature is a constant value) and everything happens according to this law. The gas circulating in the meridional direction in our device alternately experiences either compression or rarefaction. It heats up, then cools down in relation to the "normal" temperature. That's the whole effect of temperature separation. By the way, no one tried to inject water there? Should be a very interesting effect. Something like passing the "dew point" with a sharp cooling.
By the way, we can draw an interesting conclusion: but in this device it is also oscillatory process! And oscillations have a resonance - a sharp increase in amplitude with a minimum input of energy! Can you imagine how it is possible to stabilize the effect when finding here the dependencies between the amplitude of oscillations and all the influencing parameters? temperature resonance! It sounds good. And it can find excellent application in refrigeration machines.
It is my deep conviction that Schauberger was a great man and undeservedly unknown. It seems to me that he still managed to build a generator that extracts energy, it seems, from " NOTHING". More precisely, directly from the environment. Even if this is done very inefficiently, the freeness of this energy should outweigh all the arguments against it. What is still surprising? On the Internet, you can find quite a lot of information about the works of Schauberger. But, apparently, so far there is no technological revolution in energy production.It seems that there are photographs and drawings of structures.However, all the descriptions of the operation of the engine that I have met so far are so unintelligibly monotonous (and from my point of view are absolutely incorrect) that it becomes immediately clear - nothing working is simple No. I do not pretend to be the ultimate truth. Everything that is described on my website is a chain of continuous contradictions and inaccuracies. Only I am convinced that the engine is a generator with amazing properties that generates, or rather concentrates, energy from the energy of the environment is quite possible and can be manufactured right now.The socio-economic consequences of such an invention, of course, oh, will have no conceivable boundaries. This is a complete solution to energy problems and a change in the concept of vehicles.
Based on the foregoing, it remains only to draw a specific design. Well then. As a hypothetical, "virtual" engine, I propose the following "pan":
Vortex motor-generator
This device can perform the following functions:
1. Energy generator. Rather, a concentrator of energy from the environment. Do not turn your tongue to say "perpetual motion machine of the 2nd kind."
2. heat engine- the possibilities for cooling and air conditioning are especially great. By the way, the working fluid here is not necessarily water-air. It is possible air and freon.
3. Gravitational mechanism. That's a pretty cheeky statement, but I'll try to explain. And in 2 ways. 
3.1. The effect of weight loss of rapidly rotating masses is known. Why does it depend? Let's go back to Fig. Everta. It is clear that with such rotation of air, incredible speeds can be achieved (due to a small mass of air). The device is not in danger of destruction, unlike, for example, a metal flywheel. By and large, despite the complexity of the trajectory, each point of this trajectory moves tangentially to the surface of the earth. And it is quite possible to reach on this trajectory linear speed at 8 km/sec. artificial satellite with an orbit of 1 meter? Will there be levitation? HM...
3.2. Once upon a time, I got into the hands of the TM magazine with an article on gravitational mechanisms (inertioids). It described about 10 types of mechanisms and immediately explained. why they can not fully work, that is, fly. True, at the end of the article it was stated that there was still no final verdict on the operation of such devices and the question was open. Therefore, I suggest number 11. At one time, I was very interested in the rotation of a simple flywheel on the axis of an electric motor. I had the motor in my hands. Its power was 70 watts., 7000 rpm at U = 24v, the flywheel was an aluminum disk with a diameter of 10 cm, weighing 200 grams. I explain in detail. so that those who wish can try it for themselves. Unless, of course, it is interesting. When the handwheel is rotated, there is a complete feeling that you are already holding a working inertioid in your hands! It is enough to rotate the design around the hand - and a complete illusion of incomprehensible thrust in a very specific direction. Such an interesting effect is given by rotation around 2 axes simultaneously (the axis of the motor and the axis of the hand). Then an idea appeared which now, in a strange way, intersected with the essence of the Schauberger engine. Previously, it seemed to me frank nonsense, though quite interesting. I'll probably draw a little later.
And now a small conclusion to what is stated on this page. Some general basic principles can be formulated for the operation of devices that produce mechanical energy by "absorbing" energy from the environment:
1. A process is generated that is on the verge of self-support (for example, in hydraulics, a closed vortex like an Einstein glass is an extremely unstable and rather inertial state: examples are very often - a spinning funnel of water, air, a natural tornado; in electrical engineering, an electric motor and a dynamo connected on the same axis ). For real self-support, it is necessary to add external energy to such a system. Sometimes very small, compensating for friction or resistance losses.
2. Hyperbolizing process. Up to the resonance that occurs in such a device (in a vortex - heating and cooling of a water-air mixture, in electrical engineering, the induction of electromagnetic fields is obvious) ..
3. "Inversion" of the structure in relation to the environment in such a way that some part of this structure will have energy with a sharply reduced energy potential and become an energy absorber of the environment (for example, in hydraulics - central part Schauberger engine - ideally, this space is close to absolute zero in temperature and pressure, so the ordinary environment surrounding this part of the engine has an "excess" of energy. In electrical engineering - it's more complicated here - the overlap and resonance of fields is obvious, I'll leave the idea unfinished for now).
4. Release of energy "absorbed" from the outside from the closed space of the device in the form of mechanical or electrical energy.
Vivid examples of such devices:
Schauberger engine and very similar Clem engine
In electrical engineering, the Tesla generator and the Searl generator.
Now we can assume what was inside Schauberger's Repulsine. Most likely it was a design similar to the illustration below. The vortex formed in the central part absorbs with the help of a heat exchanger (essentially a conventional centrifugal pump) that minimum heat from the air passing through the turbine blades, which is necessary to maintain rotation. The engine starts when the turbine spins up and a small amount of water is injected from below. Probably, after entering the tornado mode, water is no longer needed and only air is the working fluid. The pressure inside the engine during operation is lowered in the center, increased at the periphery. The Rank effect "works" to the full extent. Rather, it should work even more pronounced than in the "Ranque tubes" (this is because the air swirling in the Ranque tubes is thrown out instantly and rather wastefully, and here this effect "accumulates" during cyclic meridional rotation). Cooled from below, the heat exchanger-turbine is heated from above by the injected ambient air. The rejection of this cooled air creates the usual jet thrust.
In short, if it really works (I believe, if the Schauberger engine really existed, then it was something like this design) - we can consider it an absolutely universal engine-propulsion-generator. Super-ecological and fuel-free. With a stream of cold air as an exhaust.
Vortex motor-generator-propulsion
The design in terms of manufacturability is at the level of the beginning of the last century, maybe even earlier. Looks like a regular vacuum cleaner. Its simplicity makes you wonder - does it work? But I don't see much of a contradiction. I think this picture can get significant distribution on the Internet. At least as a discussion.
An industrial power generation plant might look something like this:
Vortex Power Plant Block (energy cell?)
The design is extremely simple. Who said that the "trunk of a tornado" should be directed downwards? Let's turn everything upside down (by the way, in Schauberger's pencil sketch at the top of the page is also questionable - where is "top and bottom"). In this way, the generation of an artificial vortex is greatly simplified. What is needed to form a vortex? The answer is - some ambient heat, moisture, and initial swirling of a mass of moist air. Ordinary water is poured into a bowl-shaped container. At the initial stage, the motor-generator, with the help of a turbine with spiral blades, begins to twist the water-air cone, and after the structure has entered the tornado mode, absorption of heat from the surrounding air , acceleration of the movement of rarefied air along the center of the vortex and the pressure of this flow on the turbine blades. The motor-generator can be switched to the energy harvesting mode. I leave the description of the operation of the installation as minimal - the picture is extremely clear. Although the processes occurring in this device are much more complex and diverse (I deliberately omitted the formation of a minitornado when the main vortex occurs, as well as possible electrostatic effects). In this picture, I was just trying to highlight the main thing - vortex self-support process is possible and in my opinion is quite simple. I don’t know what height the resulting vortex will have (it’s quite possible - this installation can become the “rotor” of a full-scale natural tornado in an open area). And if in nature the process of vortex formation occurs all the time, and sometimes it seems to be for no reason at all, then I propose to treat this device as a set of glands and other details that contribute to the "civilized" emergence of a very common natural phenomenon.
A separate question about the dimensions of this design. Criticism on the Internet does not like a different image when someone starts talking about the significant size of the proposed structures. Therefore, I will not talk about gigantic dimensions (such a negative example is the Messiah machine with a diameter of 50 meters). Much more I like the description of the Schauberger Home Machine Power - the dimensions of this device are about 1 meter in diameter. By the way, what I propose is a kind of symbiosis between these two devices. Only structurally simpler and perhaps better. And the minimum dimensions are still determined by the laws of nature - I have never seen an air vortex in wildlife less than a meter (a simple example is the usual turbulences on a dusty road). But if you imagine the maximum dimensions of such a station! The imagination can easily draw a huge installation in an open area, which will provoke the emergence of a real tornado in all its crushing power. Only this tornado is "tamed", therefore it always stands in one place - exactly above the power plant. And if you build a complex of large-scale vortex power plants that cool the surrounding space? Here we can already talk about the impact on the climate! It would be an excellent contribution to the fight against global warming. Here is a little fantasy on the subject:
These structures, it seems to me, can be made within very wide limits in terms of size and power, but the most obvious is as a small-sized autonomous source of energy (for example, for a detached house). Remember how personal computers "filled up" at one time "large computers"? We need to be closer to the consumer!
Everything certainly looks pretty fantastic, but still I want to enhance the impression. And finally figure out what is implosion, which Schauberger constantly talked about and try to understand - what did he want to offer?
Let's start with the fact that the entire technogenic civilization currently depends on Explosions. From Latin it is an explosion, an exhaust. 
The work of any modern heat engine (left side of the figure) is the combustion of fuel in some volume, a sharp increase in temperature and expansion of the working fluid as a result of this combustion. The working fluid increased in volume presses on the piston, the turbine, it is simply discarded to obtain a reactive impulse. Almost any engine runs on the expansion process as a result of fuel combustion, constantly wasting non-renewable resources in the form of gas-oil-coal-uranium. I don’t even want to talk about the waste of such technology - you can imagine. But after all, the expansion of the working body can be obtained as a result of a completely different process! An example is a natural tornado. I'll try to explain a little. Let's imagine. that in some container they began to rotate the working fluid. In the simplest case, this is ordinary air, as in this figure on the right (a miniature model of a natural tornado). In the central part, an accelerating upward translational movement will immediately appear. There are at least 3 reasons for this:
1. At the expense underpressure by centrifugal force the central part of the vortex some an increase in volume for a finite mass of gas and a decrease in its temperature. From the sides, this mass is "supported" by the walls of the vessel, from below its bottom. There is only one way to expand - up.
2. On rarefied part of the gas in the central part Archimedes' law applies- a lighter body "floats" - something like a balloon, only without a shell.
3. The third reason is the most exotic. When air rotates, it acquires a significant electric potential. Positive in the center, negative in the periphery. Despite its simplicity, this tornado model (and the tornado itself in the original) is an excellent electrostatic generator (the theory of the emergence of such an electric potential is best reflected in the materials on the Searl generator). In a real tornado, a magnitude of millions of volts is reached and manifests itself in the constant occurrence of lightning in the "eye of the tornado" and its "trunk". Thus, in the body of a tornado, in the presence of such a high voltage, the air becomes electrified. A charges of the same name as known repel! (positively charged air molecules - devoid of electrons, repel each other). This way it happens increase in gas pressure due to electrostatic forces!. And this extension again gives an additional impetus to the upward movement of air. I wonder if such an effect is formulated in physics - an increase in the volume of gas when it is electrified? If not, why are you not discovering? Rummaging around the Internet, I didn’t find anything like that, but the effect should clearly be. I want to explain everything that has been said with this cartoon and try to prove that tornado is an electrostatic machine, and structurally the simplest. On the Internet, you can find enough designs where the rotor is a simple dielectric cylinder, on the sides of which a high voltage of several tens of kilovolts is simply applied. An avalanche of charged particles flowing between the electrodes simply turns the rotor cylinder.
With this cartoon (a section of a tornado), I would like to summarize what the authors of such structures offer and offer their answer to the question - why does the tornado actually rotate?
electrostatic
tornado model
Consider a cross section of a tornado. We will see something like a ball bearing. Research
If you want to receive news on Facebook, click "like" ×
//= \app\modules\Comment\Service::render(\app\modules\Comment\Model::TYPE_ARTICLE, $item["id"]); ?>
